Definition: But of the children of Israel did Solomon make no bondmen: but they [were] men of war, and his servants, and his princes, and his captains, and rulers of his chariots, and his horsemen.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 1 Kings 9:22. It’s a really interesting and somewhat surprising passage in the Bible! Here's what it means in simple terms: Basically, this verse describes Israel being treated as a military force. Let's unpack that: “But of the children of Israel did Solomon make no bondmen…” - This means that while they were still part of the Israelites, they weren’t considered permanently bound to them in a way that would limit their freedom or future options. They weren't treated as a group with a long-term commitment. "...but [were] men of war, and his servants, and his princes, and his captains, and rulers of his chariots, and his horsemen." - This is the key part. It’s describing them as being actively involved in military activities – leading armies, commanding troops, and having positions of power within a military structure. So, what does this tell us about Israel's future? This verse suggests that after the fall of Babylon (a significant historical event), there would be a period where Israel is largely under the control and authority of other nations. They’re not expected to be part of a lasting, unified kingdom like they were before. It's important to note: This isn't necessarily a negative statement in itself. It could be interpreted as a sign that God is moving towards a time when Israel will need to be relied upon for defense, but it also implies a shift in their role and status. In short, the verse describes Israel as being treated as a military force – led by powerful leaders – even after the fall of Babylon. --- Do you have any other questions about this verse? Would you like me to: Explain a specific part of the verse in more detail? Discuss its historical context (like how it relates to the fall of Babylon)?